Regulatory Considerations that affect the decision to Design a New Medical Device vs. Extending the Life of an Existing Medical Device

Should a medical device company design an entirely new product or extend the life of an existing design? Both approaches have their merits and drawbacks.  Both strategies come with regulatory considerations and their own set of unique advantages and challenges. 

Ultimately, the decision between designing new and extending existing products depends on various factors, including market dynamics, technological advancements, regulatory landscape, and company resources. We recently published an article that explored the Pros and Cons of each approach in medical device design that provides a good background on these factors, 

Let's explore the key regulatory considerations related to each benefit and potential issue involved in this decision. Understanding these can help businesses make informed choices that align with their goals and resources.

Read more below.

The focus and discipline of DFX is a powerful tool if used as part of a broader strategic approach to developing product/process differentiation, and a sustainable advantage against competition. Involve Design for X in Strategy. Once your team has determined the focus of your strategy, place the focus of design on developing competitive advantage. 

At Boston Engineering, DFX is a core part of creating values during our product development process. We focus on several key DFX areas that align with our expertise:

• Design for Manufacturability (DFM)
• Design for Assembly (DFA)
• Design for Cost (DFC)
• Design for Testability (DFT)
• Design for Reliability (DFR)
• Design for Serviceability/Maintainability (DFS)
• Design for Usability (DFU)
• Design for Modularity (DFMo)

Learn more about Design for X (DFX) at Boston engineering: Boston Engineering Design for X

Decision Time: Regulatory Considerations that affect Designing a New Medical Device vs. Extending the Life of an Existing Medical Device

(continued from above)

Below is a list of regulatory considerations related to the pros and cons of each approach to help your discussions around the import decisions that need to be understood:

Regulatory considerations: Benefits of Designing a New Medical Device

• Innovation: New designs allow for cutting-edge technology and novel approaches to patient care.
  
  
  • Regulatory consideration: While innovative devices may qualify for expedited review programs like the FDA's Breakthrough Devices Program, they may also face more scrutiny and require more extensive clinical data.
    
    
• Market differentiation: A unique product can help stand out in a competitive landscape.
   
  • Regulatory consideration: Differentiated products may have an easier time demonstrating substantial equivalence or clinical superiority in regulatory submissions.
• Addressing unmet needs: New designs can tackle previously unsolved medical challenges.
   
  • Regulatory consideration: Devices addressing unmet needs may qualify for special regulatory pathways or incentives, such as Humanitarian Device Exemptions.

• Improved patient outcomes: Innovative devices may offer better efficacy or safety profiles.
   
  • Regulatory consideration: Significant improvements in safety or efficacy may support claims of clinical superiority, potentially leading to expanded indications or market exclusivity.
    
    
• Intellectual property: New designs create opportunities for patents and market exclusivity.
   
  • Regulatory consideration: Strong IP and market exclusivity can be leveraged in regulatory strategies, potentially supporting longer data protection periods.

Regulatory considerations: Potential Issue of Designing a New Medical Device

• Higher development costs: Designing from scratch requires significant R&D investment.
   
  • Regulatory consideration: New designs often require more extensive and costly clinical trials to satisfy regulatory requirements.
  
  
  
• Longer time to market: New products face a more extensive regulatory approval process.
   
  • Regulatory consideration: Novel devices may require more rounds of pre-submission meetings and longer review times with regulatory bodies.
  
  
  
• Increased risk: Novel designs may encounter unforeseen challenges or complications.
   
  • Regulatory consideration: Unexpected issues discovered during the regulatory process may lead to requests for additional testing or even application rejections.
    
    
    
• User adoption hurdles: Healthcare providers may need training on entirely new systems.
   
  • Regulatory consideration: Training programs and user interfaces may need to be reviewed and approved as part of the regulatory submission.
    
    
• Manufacturing complexity: New designs often require new production processes and equipment.
   
  • Regulatory consideration: New manufacturing processes will need to be validated and may be subject to pre-approval inspections by regulatory authorities.

AL & ML in Health Care - The Medical Workplace Multiplier

In this new Whitepaper, learn how AI and ML can enhance the medical workforce’s abilities and improve patient outcomes. 

While some view AI as a potential job replacement threat, the reality is that these advanced capabilities are better positioned as “workforce multipliers” that will amplify the abilities of doctors, nurses, technicians and other medical professionals.

Download your Free Copy Today!

Artificial intelligence and machine learning are emerging technologies that have immense potential to reshape healthcare delivery and medical practice.

(continued from above)

Regulatory considerations: Benefits of Extending the Life of an Existing Medical Device Design

• Cost-effective: Incremental improvements are generally less expensive to develop.
   
  • Regulatory consideration: Minor modifications may qualify for simplified regulatory pathways, such as Special 510(k) in the US or abbreviated CE marking processes in the EU.
    
    
• Faster time to market: Modifications to existing designs often have a smoother regulatory path.
   
  • Regulatory consideration: Leveraging existing clinical data and predicate devices can expedite the regulatory review process.
    
    
• Established user base: Healthcare providers are already familiar with the core product.
   
  • Regulatory consideration: Existing post-market surveillance data can support regulatory submissions for product extensions.
• Proven track record: Extended designs build on known safety and efficacy profiles.
   
  • Regulatory consideration: Established safety records can simplify risk assessments and potentially reduce the burden of clinical evidence required for approval.
• Streamlined manufacturing: Existing production lines can often be adapted for updates.
   
  • Regulatory consideration: Minor manufacturing changes may not trigger the need for new facility inspections or extensive process validations.

Regulatory considerations: Potential Issue of Extending the Life of an Existing Medical Device Design

• Limited innovation: Incremental changes may not keep pace with technological advancements.
   
  • Regulatory consideration: Over time, regulatory bodies may increase requirements for older technologies, potentially necessitating more substantial updates.
• Market saturation: Extended designs may struggle to differentiate in mature markets.
   
  • Regulatory consideration: Difficulty in demonstrating substantial improvements may limit the ability to make superior clinical claims in regulatory submissions and marketing materials.
• Missed opportunities: Focusing on existing products could mean overlooking emerging needs.
   
  • Regulatory consideration: Failing to address new clinical needs may result in missing out on regulatory incentives for innovative or breakthrough devices.
  
  
  
• Diminishing returns: Each iteration may offer less significant improvements than the last.
   
  • Regulatory consideration: Smaller incremental improvements may not justify the cost and effort of regulatory submissions, potentially limiting update frequency.
    
    
• Competitive pressure: Rivals may leapfrog extended designs with more innovative offerings.
   
  • Regulatory consideration: As competitors introduce newer technologies, regulatory bodies may begin to view older designs less favorably, potentially increasing scrutiny during reviews.
    
    

New eBook Available Now! 

"Leveling Up Existing Products through DFX" 

-Download Insights from a DFX Subject Matter Expert- 

Developing successful new products from scratch is challenging enough, but what about improving on existing designs? 

In this eBook, we’ll dive into the real-world experiences of DFX subject matter expert John DePiano, exploring the common areas where existing product owners excel, as well as the key opportunities where targeted DFX support can drive major improvements.

 Understanding the Importance of a DFX approach in medical device design & development

Applying Design for X (DFX) methodologies upfront in medical device  development optimizes the entire lifecycle by improving manufacturability, testability, reliability, usability, and other critical characteristics. This avoids costly redesigns later on, facilitates high-quality products that satisfy customers, reduces manufacturing and service costs, and supports flexibility through modularity and platforms. The holistic perspective of DFX drives efficient, cost-effective delivery of successful products that provide competitive advantage. Investing in DFX early pays dividends across the entire product lifespan.

Do you offer training on DFX for your medical engineering teams?

Education is critical to effectively implement DFX principles. We provide training tailored to your engineers’ roles and product lines. This includes overall DFX methodology, deep dives into specific disciplines like design for reliability or manufacturability, and practical application workshops. Our hands-on approach combines real-world examples and case studies with tutorials on leading DFX software tools. The goal is building organizational DFX expertise and establishing repeatable processes that endure beyond individual projects. Investing in DFX knowledge pays dividends across your entire product portfolio. 

Ready to Begin your next medical device DFX Project? 

Impossible Challenge? Try Us. 

Selecting a partner to help you complete your design project is a valuable option to reduce project duration and save money.    

The Boston Engineering product development system encompasses DFX to ensure a smooth product launch and success in the marketplace.  Boston Engineering has DFX knowledge and experience to address aspects and values of a product such as manufacturability, test, reliability, safety, serviceability, cost, and compliance with industry standards and government regulations.

Imagine your Impact: Stay up-to date- with the latest insights and trends we're watching. Add your email address below and sign up for a Monthly Summary of our most impactful posts!